<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="todaycom/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Can Fill Ledger&#8217;s Clown Shoes?</title>
	<link>http://whatwouldbatmando.today.com/2008/08/19/who-can-fill-ledgers-clown-shoes/</link>
	<description>WWBD</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://www.today.com/version-2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: bill_finger</title>
		<link>http://whatwouldbatmando.today.com/2008/08/19/who-can-fill-ledgers-clown-shoes/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>bill_finger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatwouldbatmando.today.com/2008/08/19/who-can-fill-ledgers-clown-shoes/#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment.  I agree with you on Fraser (reluctantly), but I think you're really underestimating Mark Hamill.  With the right voice, any actor could convince fans that he's the Insane Clown Incarnate.  Mark Hamill has that voice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment.  I agree with you on Fraser (reluctantly), but I think you&#8217;re really underestimating Mark Hamill.  With the right voice, any actor could convince fans that he&#8217;s the Insane Clown Incarnate.  Mark Hamill has that voice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travelling Blackbird</title>
		<link>http://whatwouldbatmando.today.com/2008/08/19/who-can-fill-ledgers-clown-shoes/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Travelling Blackbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 18:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whatwouldbatmando.today.com/2008/08/19/who-can-fill-ledgers-clown-shoes/#comment-43</guid>
		<description>I still don't see Mark Hammill being able to take on the physicality of the role: the ticks and twitches that the Joker needs to have just seem beyond him. Although I could be wrong of course, because the performances I'm thinking of were a long time ago.

* must resist obvious joke *

Brendan Fraser is an interesting idea - under a great director, he can give a great performance, but he has also shown that he really needs the strict direction, otherwise he turns in flat or overly comic performances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still don&#8217;t see Mark Hammill being able to take on the physicality of the role: the ticks and twitches that the Joker needs to have just seem beyond him. Although I could be wrong of course, because the performances I&#8217;m thinking of were a long time ago.</p>
<p>* must resist obvious joke *</p>
<p>Brendan Fraser is an interesting idea - under a great director, he can give a great performance, but he has also shown that he really needs the strict direction, otherwise he turns in flat or overly comic performances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


